Gerry Spence & the Art of Advocacy

Professor James R. Elkins College of Law | West Virginia University

 

 

 

 

Cross-Examination

Gerry Spence Reading: "Exposing the Hidden Truth–Cross-Examination," in Gerry Spence, Win Your Case 168-222 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2005)

–"Cross-examination is simply storytelling in yet another form. Cross-examination is the method by which we tell our story to the jury though the adverse witness and, in the process, test the validity of the witness's story against our own." [Spence, Win Your Case, at 169] ["When the lawyer gets up to cross-examine he should have a significant story in mind that he wants to tell with this witness."][218] ["Basic cross-examination is nothing more than a true-or-false test administered to the witness, in the course of which our story, as it concerns that witness, is told, question by question, to the witness. It makes little difference whether the witness answers yes or no. Question by question, our story is being told. It's for the jury to determine whether the witness is telling the truth when he denies the statements contained in our questions. If we took each statement out of our cross-examination and joined them, we would have presented our story for that witness." Id. at 170] ["[B]efore we begin the cross-examination, we must have in mind the story we wish to tell through this witness. We have prepared the story for each witness and we'll not muddle around asking a bunch of meaningless questions in order to hear our own melodious voices, nor will we repeat the questions we heard on direct examination, except where it is necessary as foundation for a well-prepared cross. And, at last, we ask ourselves, do we want to cross-examine this witness at all?" Id. at 218-219

"Only the deluded or naive believe that somehow the taking of an oath prevents witnesses, even honest witnesses, from lying where they must." [Id. at 187] ["Every witness is sworn to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. But few do. If they did there would be no cause for cross-examination. But the human mind does not grasp whole truths. It grasps only those truths that serve it." Id. at 192]

–A Cautionary note:

"Witness after witness comes to the stand, and you step up with the tender hatchet and begin to hack away. And when you are through, the witness steps down off the stand, and he is never the same in the juror's eyes.

But after you have destroyed enough witnesses, something begins to dawn on the jury: This man could do this to every witness. This man could do this to me. Not one single person has taken the witness stand and escaped. And the jurors begin to look at you in a new way. What trick will he use against the next witness? Is he fair? Is the witness lying, or is the lawyer just good at twisting things? A lawyer can lose his credibility by being too nifty with the blade." [Gerry Spence, O.J., The Last Word 211-212 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997)]

Gerry Spence: A Simulated Cross-Examination

Videos

F. Lee Bailey Cross Examination
[9:24 mins.]

Irving Younger's 10 Commandments of Cross-Examination

Professor Rose: Seven Steps to Cross Examination
[10:02 mins.] [Prof. Rose cross examines a witness :: 10:31 mins.]

Professor Rose: Fundamentals of Cross-Examination
[17:18 mins.]

The Secret to Successful Cross-Examination

How to Testify During Cross-Examination

Secrets of Cross-Examination

Two Quick & Easy Cross-Examination Tips
[10:03 mins.]

Cross Examination: Constructing, Organizing & Connecting
[10:46 mins.] [Professor Wes Porter, Director of the GGU Litigation Center at Golden Gate University--San Francisco School of Law] [Organizing Questions in Blocks :: 13:17 mins.] [Modes of Impeachment & Attacking Credibility 13:38 mins.]

Cross Examination: Attitude & the Conversational Cross
[10:44 mins.]

A Guide to Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statement
[4:17 mins.]

How Impeachment Works
[10:08 mins.]

Bias Impeachment
[4:05 mins.]

Mastering Cross-Examination
[32:23 mins.]

Cross Examination of a Police Office
[13:53 mins.]

Hugh Gottschalk: 10 Commandments of Cross Examination
[8:58 mins.] ["Cross examination is the battleground of the trial."] Pt2 [9:51 mins.]

Terry MacCarthy on Cross Examination
[25:51 mins.] [Pt2 :: 57:57 mins.] [Pt3 :: 54:16 mins.] [Pt4 :: 40:44 mins.] [Pt5 :: 1:07:09 mins.] [Pt6 :: 1:59:23 mins.] [Pt7 :: 1:51:47 mins.]

Border Patrol Agent Cross-Examined

Court drama during cross examination of double murder victims father
[9:48 mins.] [ Dale Linder Sr. and Attorney Michael Duff clash during a hearing in Lorain Municipal Court. Linder's two sons were allegedly killed by their cousin Donna Brown. The defense is claiming she was tormented by the men for being a lesbian and that she was pistol whipped by one of them the night before before the shooting.]

Jodi Arias Cross-Examination by Prosecution
[Lester Street murder trial] [State's Opening Statement] [State's Closing Argument] [Defense Closing Argument]

Jessie Dotson Cross-Examination by Prosecution

Bruce Culter: The Phil Spector Murder Case
[Critique of Bruce Culter]

Defense Gains Ground On Cross-Examination Of Witnesses

Myles Webster Trial: Direct examination of Officer Dan Doherty
[41:04 mins.] Police Officer Dan Doherty Faces Cross Examination [42:54 mins.] State's Closing Argument [27:54 mins.] Defense Counsel Closing Statement [58:30 mins.] Verdict [6:15 mins.]

On Cross-Examination

Ten Commandments of Cross Examination
[Timothy A. Pratt, trial attorney and partner in the firm of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., Kansas City, Missouri]

Cross-examination in Criminal Cases
[Ray Moses, Center for Criminal Justice Advocacy]

Use Psychology in Cross-Examination
[Trial, 2007]

Cross-Examination of the Witness that Cannot Be Cross-Examined
[Ronald V. Miller, Jr., The Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog]

Cross-Examination
[Benjamin J. Cantor]

Bibliography: Books

Francis L. Wellman, The Art of Cross-Examination (Touchstone, 1997)

Michael E. Tigar, Examining Witnesses (Chicago: American Bar Association, 2nd ed., 2004)

Bibliography: Articles

A Checklist of Winning Cross-Examintion Concepts and Techniques

Prior Inconsistent Statements

Scott Turow, Crossing the Star, 14 Litigation 40 (1987)

Return to: Homepage

Contact Professor Elkins by Email